I don’t really like most episodes
of the twilight zone. It’s not that I have anything against Rod Serling per se,
it’s just that I think many of his viewpoints are depressing. In one particular
episode, a scientist despairing at the state of the world builds a time machine
and attempts to change three major events in the history of the world; warning
the Japanese about the bombing of Hiroshima, attempting to assassinate Hitler,
and trying to stop the torpedoing of the Lusitania. In each time period, he is
unable to change the course of events, because history, in Mr. Serling’s view
is static; that is events are predetermined, and one cannot change anything in
the world.
I choose to disagree because if
that is so, then there really is no free will at all. If all our actions are
merely parts being played in a vast cosmic play, then what is the purpose of
any of the decisions we make. Armed with foresight about the world, Serling’s
protagonist attempts to escape to a Midwestern town in the 1800s, the epitome
of the small town ideal. In this time, he is unable to prevent the fire that
took the lives of several school children, and in the process of attempting to
change the event ends up causing it himself.
I believe that history can be
changed. Pick an apple in old England and Newton may never have considered
gravity.
The subject reminds me that there
is currently a researcher attempting to make a time machine at UConn. Current
scientific consensus is that if the time machine does in fact work, you could
only conceivably take is back to the point at which it was invented. Barring
all technological or physical obstacles, I can think of a few places I’d like
to time travel to:
First, I would like to go to the
“beginning” of human history and observe the first Homo sapiens. There are many hypothesis out there about when
humanity first began to exhibit modern behavior and I think it would be the
opportunity of a lifetime to go back and see it. Assuming changes were
reversible—and I think I’m more in the territory of a “what-if” machine by
now—I’d love to see what would have happened had evolution taken another path;
what if we were the descendants of another hominin like Paranthropus bosiei or even if another genus had developed in our
place (hyper intelligent ants? Birds? Elephants?)
Second, I’d like to take an
afternoon and visit some of the greatest pioneers of science; Einstein, Edison,
Tesla, Newton, Galileo, and see what they would make of our world today.
Third, I would visit some of the
greatest cities in the Ancient world in their prime: Pompeii, Rome, Tenochtitlan, Babylon, Jericho, see the pyramids being built. I’d sit in Athens
and hear the lyre music that has been completely lost to modern ears. On the
other side, I’d love to see Manhattan island the way it was before Hudson
“discovered” it. I’d like to feel the absolute wonder you must have gotten
looking out on a forest and knowing it goes for hundreds of hundreds of miles.
In some ways, because I was born in
the nineties, and have seen so many technological advances in my short 22
years, it feels like the future can’t be to foreign. Serling’s scientist never
went to the future—at least in that episode—and I think it was a mistake. His
fundamentally pessimistic viewpoint precluded the potential bright future that
might lay ahead.
I think I would have gone ahead to
see what we accomplish in ten, a hundred, or a thousand years. Unlike most
people, it seems, I’m confident that we’ll find the solutions to disease, to
global warming, and to war. Sterling may have been stuck on the evils we as a
society have perpetrated in the past, but I’d rather look ahead. That future,
it seems I can change, whatever Mr. Serling may have believed.
He might have been right. But since
I don’t know what will happen, and time travel—at least for now—isn’t real, I’d
prefer to go on thinking that what I do has a drastic effect on how the future
plays out, because while my actions may not make a difference to the world,
they make a world of difference to me.
I kind of think the energy crisis (and global warming) will be settled, but have doubts about war. Even if it was, I'll bet the world will face a whole other host of problems, in any given time period. I see a small connection in global problems and those of an individual person in that we have our triumphs and failures, but the problems persist, no matter what. I don't think a time machine serves any purpose because we've got enough on our plate right here and now, and it is our will as humans to stride onwards. Being in an optimistic mood right now, I can say lets get at it.
ReplyDeleteThen again, what's the point of living if we can't enjoy ourselves? It's got to be a balance I guess. In any case, the fact that you'll save someone's life one day is an amazing thing. Medicine is a very noble profession.
Engineers just kind of get off on efficiency.